Home/MOTOROLA EDGE 40 PRO
MOTOROLA EDGE 40 PRO
Performance
Camera
Autonomy
Display
Storage
Design
The cheapest
Unknown
Characteristics MOTOROLA EDGE 40 PRO
Screen size6.67 "
RAM12 GB
Internal storage256 GB
AnTuTu1312001
Capacity4600 mAh
Description
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a smartphone designed to deliver balanced performance across a range of features. It is equipped with 12 GB of RAM, supporting multitasking and smooth operation under everyday usage conditions. Storage capabilities are substantial, offering 256 GB of internal space for apps, media, and documents.
The device features a good-quality display that provides sharp visuals and an engaging viewing experience. Its camera system is designed to capture images and video with clarity and detail, making it suitable for general photography and video recording tasks.
Battery capacity stands at 4600 mAh, which contributes to a satisfactory level of autonomy during typical daily use. The phone supports wireless charging, offering users flexibility in how they choose to recharge the device.
Additional features include NFC compatibility, enabling contactless communication and transactions, as well as 5G connectivity for access to high-speed mobile data networks. The design of the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is aesthetically considered, contributing to a modern and refined appearance.
Price History
min
max
fix
Products with similar characteristics
Reviews
Anonymous
Thanks for the heads up, but the Battery life results here are big? Maybe it's something else you got on the phone that eats battery? Or maybe the Update nuked it. I'm getting really wary of any Android version updates, on most phones i see the exact same bs...
professional chap
DO NOT buy a Moto Edge 40 Pro if you intend to use it very frequently. The battery is absolutely woeful. I use mine for online trading and I have to charge the battery 2 to 3 times a day. It is not just my phone, they are all like that. I do not go out for the day without my charger, especially when travelling. Admittedly the phone charges really fast but the appalling battery life makes the phone unreliable
Sony
Suspicious display. It is bright enough?
Don t agree
I don't agree isocell is inferior than Sony. Depends which model but overall, I tend to prefer those Samsung's. I'm not pro, I just care the result. People venerate pixels stills, and last pixels use mostly isocells, because cheaper, if I'm not wrong.
Omnivisions yes usually inferior from my experiences with moto. It's not it's bad, it's, it has it's flaws, usually getting bad in some direct sunlight if that mean anything.
I think moto uses ov for both price and compact size. To me those proeminent Sony sensors on IP looks just... ugly.
Also about ram I don't think so. I think moto has better ram. AnTuTu and gb performance are better on edge 40 pro than s23 for example, same proc but overclocked on samsung, so could only be better ram.
What I'd worry more about moto is reliability. Chinese components and 120w vs more conservative power and Korean components.
Also those edge borders, I'm not sure, must be used with care no ?
About victus being version +, ++,+1,+2... Does it really matters. I feel more a marketing increment there. I don't see what could change that dramatically on glass technology last year.
Edge borders fragile
Looks great, also recent price drop.
Worrying about edges borders and slippery back, is it fragile ?
Daylight main cam is ok, not a surprise with moto and ov sensors. Great selfies and nightshots though.
Anonymous
how does this compare to the xiaomi 13t pro
UPPU RAJU
Moto edge 40pro wts processer snapdragon or mtk
DFK4655
The curved class is nice to hold. There is an issue though. So far I have had 2 cases and am on my 3rd protective screen. There seems to be an issue with glass adhesive, apparently only on the curved edges, and the case mounting where the case is actively pushing the glass up. Result is the glass falls off after a few days. Because of this, and a phone drop, I now have a cracked screen. The phone is great, love it, the accessories are sub par and need rethought.
BananasInPajamas
I paid £254 in UK with Bose quiet comfort 2 buds thrown in. I bought it for my wife.
Overall I've been pleasantly surprised. The phone is slim and easy to hold, certainly compared to the brick that is my Pixel 6.
I can't comment on battery life for a heavy phone user, but my wife certainly isn't a heavy user. The phone still has 34% battery after 4 days. Now let's put that in perspective, that's with very little screen or call time. It's in a poor signal area with WiFi calling on and Bluetooth on. A multi-day standby time is far more important to my wife than long screen time. I did peg the screen at 60hz and turn off 5g (there is no 5g out in the sticks where we live).
The camera is ok, it's not a patch on my Pixel 6.
Overall, for the price I think it is a solid handset for a user like my wife who just wants a light, cheap phone with minimal bloatware and good standby life and the option to take reasonable snaps.
She really won't care about major OS patches so long as security patches come out as promised.
My guess is that the battery benchmarks above are flawed but not interested enough to try and find out as day-to-day the battery is fine for my wife's phone usage profile.