Price History
min
max
fix
SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
Performance
Camera
Autonomy
Display
Storage
Design
Best choice
₹1,04,990
The price is good
Based on the last 30 days, the current price is ₹888.34 lower than usual
Characteristics SAMSUNG GALAXY Z FOLD4
Screen size7.6 "
RAM12 GB
Internal storage1000 GB
AnTuTu964532
Capacity4400 mAh
Description
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a cutting-edge smartphone known for its versatile performance and high-end specifications. It features a robust 12GB of RAM, ensuring smooth multitasking and efficient handling of demanding applications. The device is equipped with a high-quality camera setup that delivers good photographic results, capturing detailed and vibrant images.
In terms of battery life, the Galaxy Z Fold4 provides satisfactory performance with its 4400mAh battery capacity. It supports wireless charging, adding convenience for on-the-go power replenishment. The phone's autonomy is complemented by NFC and 5G capabilities, which enhance connectivity and data transfer speeds.
This model shines with a 1000GB storage capacity, offering ample space for applications, media, and documents, making it very good for users who need substantial storage. The display quality of the Galaxy Z Fold4 is good, providing clear and sharp visuals, which is beneficial for both productivity tasks and entertainment.
The design of the smartphone is sleek and modern, aligning with contemporary aesthetics and providing users with a sophisticated look and feel. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 stands out as a highly capable and versatile device in the modern smartphone market.
₹1,38,475
Free delivery
Min
Max
Fix
₹1,04,990
Free delivery
Min
Max
Fix
Products with similar characteristics
Smartphones
SAMSUNG GALAXY S23
Price
₹44,994
Reviews
Anonymous
dont buy fold. just after 3-4 months there were display problems. company didnot respond because its warranty for 3 months only. if display problem araises.. you have to pay 60k. better go for any other model except fold series.
Anonymous
I had bought Samsung galaxy Z fold 4 in January last year and it worked very well and was useful for 1st year. Then 3 months after expiry of my phone's manufacturer warranty, one day the WiFi stopped working. I looked for online help and realised it's a hardware issue. Then I headed to Samsung galaxy store. After explaining the issue briefly, the attendant smiled and replied, It will take at least one week and AED 1650 to fix the issue. This is more than 1/4th of original phone cost. I decided not to repair it until I have a spare phone. In the following week the display started flickering. Then one days I realised second SIM slot was not working and later on even the first SIM slot stopped working. Next day the front camera stopped working and few hours later the front display stopped working. The only way to use the phone was through big internal screen which also stopped working next day. Now this phone is absolutely useless with all my data not backed up because of WiFi and SIM slot issue...
When I asked for quotation from other mobile phone service centers they said this issue is very common and the screen costs a bomb with which all the other parts are connected and repairing the phone is impractical because of exorbitant costs.
When I shared this with my colleagues they advised me to put this experience in public forum for awareness. And hence this long post. Thanks for reading and avoid buying into this primitive technology.
Cooe
"The Galaxy Z Fold4 has a main camera similar to that employed by the Galaxy S22 line, although with less sophisticated autofocusing"
🤦😑 Stop it, and do better. Because you guys have had this inaccurate point completely backwards LITERALLY since the original review!!! It's the ISOCELL GN3 in the Fold 4 that's the newer & better version of this sensor family, NOT the older GN5 from the S22 lineup! There's a reason Samsung has reused the GN3 in EVERY, SINGLE flagship they've released since right up to this very day (S23, Fold 5, S24, & even rumored to still be in the S25 as well!) and NOT the S22's GN5!
If the GN5 really does have Dual Pixel Pro and the newer GN3 doesn't that means Samsung decided it was either not worth using or actively inferior to the older Dual Pixel system. Either that, or you guys just got this backwards too and the GN3's the one w/ Dual Pixel Pro support... Honestly, with your guy's track record as exhibited up above, my guess is on the latter. 🤷
Cooe
"The aspect ratio went from 25:9 to 23.1:9.
As those numbers strongly imply, the problem is that it's less tall by only a teeny tiny amount, and so the issue with typing on the outer screen remains"
🤦 ... What an utterly crap, absolutely nonsensical take... 😑 While a +3mm increase in display width doesn't sound like much in absolute terms, it most definitely WAS in relative terms as that's a SIGNIFICANT difference in aspect ratio! It basically cut the gap between it and a reasonably normal, ala Z Flip's, ≈22:9 aspect ratio practically in HALF!!! And the difference in day-to-day usability on that front display was legit dramatic! (I've owned & used both a Fold 3 & 4 for long periods of time.)
This is literally like saying a modern ≈19:9 phone and an old-school ≈16:9 phone's display shapes are "different by only a teeny tiny amount"... 🤦 ... 😑
Also, making the front screen even wider will turn the internal tablet display into an awful SQUARE that's garbage for BOTH watching widescreen media in landscape and scrolling through modern vertical app feeds & webpages in portrait!
That's is actually the exact problem that the OnePlus Open has. Thanks to that "normal sized/width" 20:9 front display, despite it having a SIGNIFICANTLY larger tablet display in total area, the viewable 16:9 media area on it is actually slightly SMALLER than on a Fold 4/5 simply because the screen is so ridiculously freaking square!!! (≈9:8 vs Fold 4/5's ≈6:5)
Cooe
"The flexible layer above the OLED pixels is still only sort of glass as far as our understanding goes, even though Samsung and the product's (most likely) supplier Schott call it UTG (Ultra-Thin Glass)."
🤦😑 Schott and soon Corning's UTG folding glass is not just "only sort of glass", it literally IS GLASS!!!! Straight up. End of story. Stop spreading misleading bulls**t misinformation please!
Just because a sheet of glass is manufactured to be so ridiculously freaking thin (specifically just 30 microns in this case) that it's flexible enough to be able to almost bend in half, DOESN'T SUDDENLY MAKE IT NOT GLASS ANYMORE!!! And the same exact thing applies to putting one or more plastic protective layers on it. You don't suddenly consider normal slab phones with plastic screen protectors on them to "no longer have glass displays" just because your finger isn't directly touching glass, do you??? O_o
No matter how thin it is, or how many layers of plastic is put on top of it, glass is still glass, is still glass. Whether something is made of glass or not has absolutely NOTHING to do with its strength/durability. It has to do with the object's material science chemistry. And UTG folding glass is most definitely made out of ACTUAL, REAL GLASS!!! And this is why it actually feels like glass under the finger! Go try an ACTUALLY plastic display like an OG Fold 1 or the 2019-2020 RAZR and the difference in finger feel and consistency will be STARKLY apparent. 🤷
Cooe
"The fine print starts with the fact that the main camera on the Fold4 is based on the Samsung GN3 sensor, whereas the S22s have an GN5 at the core. Both sensors have a 1/1.56" optical format, 50million 1.0µm pixels, and a Tetrapixel filter array (Quad Bayer in Sony speak).
Where the two differ is in the autofocusing - the GN5 uses Dual Pixel Pro, while the GN3 in the Fold4 relies on a slightly less sophisticated Dual Pixel method."
🤦😑 WRONG!!! The Samsung ISOCELL GN3 camera sensor used in the Galaxy Fold 4 is the newer & superior version of that sensor design to the older ISOCELL GN5 used in the S22 lineup, NOT the other way around!!! This is why the GN3 is the sensor that Samsung has continued to reuse on literally every flagship since right up to this very day (S23, Fold 4, S24), not the GN5!
If it really does have the older "Dual Pixel" instead of the "Dual Pixel Pro" autofocusing system, then that just means that Samsung either decided the latter wasn't worth using and switched back OR even more likely, you just have that backwards and it's the newer GN3 with Dual Pixel Pro support... 🤦
Cooe
"The cover screen of the Fold4 also got a change of aspect, moving away from the 25:9 (that's nearly 3:1, if you hadn't thought it that way) to a more manageable 23.1:9, while maintaining the diagonal."
This is wrong!!! The Fold 3's cover display had a ≈24.5:9 aspect ratio, NOT ≈25:9! It was the Fold 2's front display that was actually ≈25:9.
(Fold 3 had ever so slightly slimmer front display bezels vs Fold 2 which made the cover screen about +1mm wider, and thus evvvvver so slightly less narrow.)
Cooe
"The new, more squarish, aspect of the screen may have some minor implications on its usability (positive ones, we'd say)"
Uhh... What the hell are you even talking about???... O_o The main interior display's more wide/square aspect ratio is nothing but a NEGATIVE in terms of usability! It means bigger empty black bars when watching widescreen media in landscape and an inferior experience for scrolling through modern vertical app feeds and website layouts in portrait. In addition, the wider, squarer display also makes it harder and more uncomfortable to type if you don't use a split layout keyboard.
(Heck, due to text size limitations, you can't even really fit much more "webpage" on screen at once in most cases, with it instead simply leading to more empty unused space on the left & right side of the device when browsing!)
All that said, don't get me wrong here, the aspect ratio changes Samsung made with the Fold 4 were still COMPLETELY the right & correct call overall!!! That extra +3mm of front cover display width makes an absolutely GARGANTUAN difference to its overall usability that CANNOT BE OVERSTATED!!! ESPECIALLY for things like two hand typing!
But trying to also pretend like the internal display now being more square shaped as a result is somehow a "positive thing for usability" is absolutely freaking absurd... 🤦😑 ... Having bigger black bars and more empty unused space is literally NEVER a "positive for usability" lol. 🤷
Anonymous
not worthy of the price..after the warranty expired phone was dead..disposable phone..